Simultaneous cut and coagulation. Requires different modes and adjustments for different applications.
Minimal smoke production. Produces excessive smoke.
Minimal surrounding tissue damage. Tissue damage like 3rd degree burns.
Heats tissues below 10000C. Raises tissue temperature above 50000C.
Sterilizes tissues under application. Can cause postoperative sepsis.
Minimal scarring creates soft supple scar. Gross scarring and fibrosis.
Faster healing. Slow healing.

Tissue interaction can be
predetermined with power
setting selection.
Difficult to achieve precise
tissue destruction.
No tissue adherence
or charring.
Probes often stick to the site of
application and cause detachment
of the tissue with bleeding.
Minimal postoperative edema and discharge. Extensive edema and profuse discharge from the treated area.
Result is immediately visible. Uncertainty of result due to
variable tissue response.
Multiple uses in proctology. Used for the treatment
of hemorrhoids alone.

Adaptable for multiple uses in
Limited applications in proctology
Equally effective for cutting and coagulation. Good cutting effect but poor coagulation.
Unit cost much less. High instrument cost.
Portable. Limited mobility.
Inexpensive treatment. Costly treatment.
Easy anal canal access due to variable electrodes. Limited access in the anal canal.
Faster healing. Risk of misdirected reflected beam and delayed wound healing.

Other advantages of radiofrequency surgery -
Radiofrequency surgery allows cutting without pressure and consequently, there is little tissue damage and minimal scarring24. The electrode tip is sterile, as is all the tissue being exposed to it25. Healing is by granulation, with a soft and supple scar26. It could be performed with ease even in the depth and in difficult areas like the anal canal. There are minimal incidences of postoperative infection, thereby achieving faster wound healing with negligible use of sutures etc.

The electrodes are reusable and may be kept in cold sterilization solution when not in use.

Use of radiofrequency in performance of various proctology surgeries results in less trauma to the cells, less fibrous scarring and less postoperative discomfort. The procedures are cost effective as no expenses of recurring nature are incurred. The radiofrequency tool having a versatile use in various surgical procedures can prove handy for the practicing surgeons.

1.   Fernando HC, Hoyos AD, Litle V, Belani CP, Luketich JD. Radiofrequency ablation: identification of the ideal patient. Clin Lung Cancer. 2004; 6:149-153.
2.   Rex J, Ribera M, Bielsa I, Paradelo C, Ferrandiz C. Surgical management of rhinophyma: report of eight patients treated with electrosection. Dermatol
      Surg 2002; 28: 347-349.
3.   Wedman J, Miljeteig H.Treatment of simple snoring using radio waves for coagulation of uvula and soft palate: a day-case surgery procedure. Laryngoscope.
      2002; 112: 1256-1259.
4.   Plant RL. Radiofrequency treatment of tonsillar hypertrophy. Laryngoscope 2002; 112: 20-22.
5.   Weber JC, Navarra G, Jiao LR, Nicholls JP, Jensen SL, Habib NA. New technique for liver resection using heat coagulative necrosis.
      Ann.Surg.2002; 236: 560-563.
6.   Glover JL, Bendick PJ, Link WJ. The use of thermal knives in surgery: Electrosurgery, lasers, plasma scalpel. Curr Probl Surg1978; 15:1-78.
7.   Bridenstine JB. Use of ultra-high frequency electrosurgery (radiosurgery) for cosmetic surgical procedures. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24:397-400.
8.   Hettinger DF. Soft tissue surgery using Radiowave techniques. J.Am.Podiatr.Med.Assoc. 1997; 87: 131-135.
9.   Valinsky MS, Hettinger DF, Gennett PM. Treatment of verrucae via radiowave surgery. J Am Podtr Med Assoc 1990; 80: 482-488.
10. Brown J.S. Radio surgery for minor opeations in general practice. Cosmetic Dermatology, 2000:33-36.
11. Hurwitz JJ, Johnson D, Howarth D, Molgat M. High-frequency radio wave electosection of full-thickness eyelid tissues. Can J Ophthalmol. 1992; 28: 28-31.
12. Gupta PJ. Removal of hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous anal polyps increases patient satisfaction after anal fissure surgery.
      Tech Coloproctol. 2003; 7: 155-158.
13. Gupta PJ. Sphincterotomy with radio frequency surgery: a new treatment technique of fissure in ano and associated pathologies. Rom J Gastroenterol.
      2003; 12: 37-40.
14. Gupta PJ. Current trends of management for fissure in ano. Rom J Gastroenterol. 2002; 11: 25-27.
15. Gupta PJ. Pilonidal sinotomy with radiofrequency. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003; 13: 540-541.
16. Saidi MH, Setzler FD Jr., Saddler RK, Farhart SA, Akright BD. Comparison of office loop electro surgical conization and cold knife conization.
      J Am Assoc Gynecol laparosc. 1994; 1: 135-139.
17. Gupta PJ. Anal Fistulotomy with Radiofrequency. Dig Surg 2004; 21: 72-73.
18. Gupta PJ. Novel technique: radiofrequency coagulation--a treatment alternative for early-stage hemorrhoids. MedGenMed. 2002; 4: 1.
19. Gupta PJ. Radiofrequency ablation and plication of hemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol. 2003; 7: 45-50; discussion 50.
20. Gupta PJ.Radiofrequency coagulation with Thiersch's Operation- A better palliative treatment in prolapse rectum. Curr Surg 2002; 59: 567-569.
21. Turner RJ, Cohen RA, Voet RL, Stephens SR, Weinstein SA. Analysis of tissue margins of cone biopsy specimens obtained
      with " cold Knife", CO2 and Nd: YAG lasers and a radiofrequency surgical unit. J Reprod Med 37: 607-610.
22. Goncalves JC, Martins C. Debulking of skin cancers with radio frequency before cryosurgery. Dermatol Surg. 1997; 23: 253-256; discussion 256-257.
23. Sadick NS, Makino Y. Selective electro-thermolysis in aesthetic medicine: a review. Lasers Surg Med. 2004; 34: 91-97.
24. Hofmann A, Wustner M, Ciric B. Radiowave Surgery Case Report. Int J Aest Rest Surg 1996; 4: 131-133.
25. Pfenninger JL, DeWitt DE. Radio frequency surgery. In Pfenninger JL, Fowler GC edits. Procedures for primary care physicians.
      Mosby; 1994. St.Louis: pp 91-101.
26. Brown J.S. Radiosurgery. In Minor Surgery a text and atlas. 3rd edition; London. Chapman and Hall: pp 324-325.